Optimizing Multimedia Streaming Quality Through Adaptive Compression and Edge Computing for High Definition Interactive Multimedia Applications
Keywords:
Adaptive streaming, Edge computing, Video compression, Quality experience, Bandwidth optimizationAbstract
This study explores the integration of adaptive streaming models with edge computing to optimize multimedia delivery, particularly in real-time applications such as video conferencing, live streaming, and virtual reality. The proposed model leverages adaptive compression techniques, including scalable video coding (SVC) and hybrid adaptive compression (HAC), which adjust video quality based on real-time network conditions. The use of edge computing further enhances the model by processing and delivering content closer to the user, reducing latency and optimizing bandwidth usage. The research demonstrates that the edge computing-based adaptive streaming model significantly improves latency by up to 30%, reduces bandwidth consumption, and ensures higher visual quality during video playback, even under fluctuating network conditions. This model addresses key challenges in multimedia streaming, such as maintaining video quality in bandwidth-constrained environments and minimizing buffering times. Furthermore, it enhances the overall Quality of Experience (QoE) for users by providing smoother interactions and real-time responsiveness. The study highlights the potential impact of this model on various fields, including remote education, entertainment, and interactive applications, where low-latency content delivery and high-quality streaming are critical. The findings suggest that integrating AI algorithms for even more efficient compression and expanding edge computing infrastructures will further optimize multimedia streaming in the future, ensuring reliable and high-quality user experiences in increasingly connected environments.
References
[1] H. Arisawa and T. Sato, Development of interactive multimedia education system (IMES) as an international education platform. 2015. doi: 10.1007/978-4-431-54804-1_22.
[2] Z. Meng and M. Xu, “Latency Optimization in Interactive Multimedia Streaming,” SpringerBriefs Comput. Sci., vol. Part F3597, pp. 1 – 134, 2024, doi: 10.1007/978-981-97-6729-8.
[3] A. Bentaleb, M. Lim, S. Hammoudi, S. Harous, and R. Zimmermann, “Solutions, Challenges, and Opportunities in Volumetric Video Streaming: An Architectural Perspective,” ACM Trans. Multimed. Comput. Commun. Appl., vol. 21, no. 7, 2025, doi: 10.1145/3705321.
[4] T. Touseef et al., “Boosting Application Performance using Heterogeneous Virtual Channels: Challenges and Opportunities,” in HotNets 2023 - Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks, 2023, pp. 139 – 146. doi: 10.1145/3626111.3628193.
[5] W. U. Rahman, C. Seon Hong, and E.-N. Huh, “Performance Evaluation of Edge Computing Assisted Adaptive Streaming Algorithms,” in International Conference on Information Networking, 2020, pp. 226 – 231. doi: 10.1109/ICOIN48656.2020.9016583.
[6] M. Kim and K. Chung, “Edge Computing Assisted Adaptive Streaming Scheme for Mobile Networks,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 2142 – 2152, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3047373.
[7] W. Wang, X. Wei, W. Tao, M. Zhou, and C. Ji, “Quality of Experience-Oriented Cloud-Edge Dynamic Adaptive Streaming: Recent Advances, Challenges, and Opportunities,” Symmetry (Basel)., vol. 17, no. 2, 2025, doi: 10.3390/sym17020194.
[8] M. Darwich, K. Khalil, Y. Ismail, and M. Bayoumi, “Adaptive Video Streaming: An AI-Driven Approach Leveraging Cloud and Edge Computing,” in 2023 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Blockchain, and Internet of Things, AIBThings 2023 - Proceedings, 2023. doi: 10.1109/AIBThings58340.2023.10292484.
[9] L. Amour, M. S. Mushtaq, S. Souihi, and A. Mellouk, “QoE-Based Framework to Optimize User Perceived Video Quality,” in Proceedings - Conference on Local Computer Networks, LCN, 2017, pp. 599 – 602. doi: 10.1109/LCN.2017.96.
[10] F. De Turck, S. Petrangeli, J. Van Der Hooft, and T. Wauters, “Quality of experience-centric management of adaptive video streaming services: Status and challenges,” ACM Trans. Multimed. Comput. Commun. Appl., vol. 14, no. 2s, 2018, doi: 10.1145/3165266.
[11] W. U. Rahman, C. S. Hong, and E.-N. Huh, “Edge Computing Assisted Joint Quality Adaptation for Mobile Video Streaming,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 129082 – 129094, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2940292.
[12] B. Chen, Z. Shang, A. C. Bovik, J. W. Chung, and D. Lerner, “A REAL-WORLD SATELLITE VIDEO SUBJECTIVE QOE DATABASE,” in Proceedings - International Conference on Image Processing, ICIP, 2024, pp. 83 – 88. doi: 10.1109/ICIP51287.2024.10648012.
[13] M. Darwich, K. Khalil, and M. Bayoumi, “Adaptive Multi-Path Video Streaming Using AI-Driven Edge Computing for Enhanced Quality of Experience (QoE),” in 2024 2nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Blockchain, and Internet of Things, AIBThings 2024 - Proceedings, 2024. doi: 10.1109/AIBThings63359.2024.10863096.
[14] G. Yi et al., “The ACM Multimedia 2019 live video streaming grand challenge,” in MM 2019 - Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 2019, pp. 2622 – 2626. doi: 10.1145/3343031.3356083.
[15] M. M. Awad and N. N. Khamiss, “Low Latency UHD Adaptive Video Bitrate Streaming Based on HEVC Encoder Configurations and Http2 Protocol,” Iraqi J. Sci., vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 1836 – 1847, 2022, doi: 10.24996/ijs.2022.63.4.40.
[16] M. K. I. Ibraheem, A. V. Dvorkovich, and I. M. Abdalameer Al-Khafaji, “A Comprehensive Literature Review on Image and Video Compression: Trends, Algorithms, and Techniques,” Ing. des Syst. d’Information, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 863 – 876, 2024, doi: 10.18280/isi.290307.
[17] K. M. Awad and A. M. Sagheer, “Design and analysis of multimedia compression techniques,” Asian J. Inf. Technol., vol. 15, no. 24, pp. 5154 – 5159, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85011692256&partnerID=40&md5=61217ad3e5b0d4c64e8b1d55ebb2bbe5
[18] U. Sharma, A. Malviya, and R. Shree, “Exploring The Role of Edge Computing In Optimizing Broadcast Technologies,” in Proceedings - 2024 13th IEEE International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies, CSNT 2024, 2024, pp. 117 – 126. doi: 10.1109/CSNT60213.2024.10546077.
[19] G. Navamani and N. Sumathi, “Optimizing Video Streaming Services Using Edge Computing for Reduced Latency with Bandwidth Allocation Algorithms and Federated Learning,” in 2025 International Conference on Networks and Cryptology, NETCRYPT 2025, 2025, pp. 155 – 159. doi: 10.1109/NETCRYPT65877.2025.11102471.
[20] Y. Y. Raghav and R. Kait, Edge computing empowering distributed computing at the edge. 2024. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-0900-1.ch003.
[21] S. Yi, Z. Hao, Q. Zhang, Q. Zhang, W. Shi, and Q. Li, “LAVEA: Latency-Aware video analytics on edge computing platform,” in 2017 2nd ACM/IEEE Symposium on Edge Computing, SEC 2017, 2017. doi: 10.1145/3132211.3134459.
[22] M. Barreda-Ángeles et al., “Quality of Experience and Quality of Service Metrics for 3D Content,” Signals Commun. Technol., pp. 267 – 297, 2019, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-77842-6_10.
[23] I. de Fez, R. Belda, and J. C. Guerri, “New objective QoE models for evaluating ABR algorithms in DASH,” Comput. Commun., vol. 158, pp. 126–140, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.comcom.2020.05.011.
[24] K. Hodžić, M. Cosovic, S. Mrdovic, J. J. Quinlan, and D. Raca, “DashReStreamer: Framework for Creation of Impaired Video Clips under Realistic Network Conditions,” ACM Trans. Multimed. Comput. Commun. Appl., vol. 21, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1145/3640016.
[25] A. Floris, L. Atzori, and G. Ginesu, “The impact of interactivity on the QoE: A preliminary analysis,” in 2015 IEEE International Conference on Communication Workshop, ICCW 2015, 2015, pp. 1711 – 1716. doi: 10.1109/ICCW.2015.7247427.
