Toward a Lecturer-Centered Gamification Framework in Pedagogical Design in STEM Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66472/dimuvi.v1i2.391Keywords:
Gamification, Instructional Design, Lecturer Centered, Pedagogical, STEM Higher EducationAbstract
Gamification has been widely implemented in STEM based higher education to increase student engagement and motivation. However, the conceptual foundation is still dominated by a student-centered or system-centered approach. This study aims to examine the extent to which lecturer-centered perspectives are integrated in gamification-based STEM learning. By following the PRISMA 2020 protocol, a total of 1,321 initial documents were identified from the Scopus database. After going through a rigorous screening and feasibility assessment process, 97 peer-reviewed journal articles were evaluated, and only 11 studies (11.3%) demonstrated structured pedagogical modeling by explicitly placing lecturers as instructional designers. Bibliometric analysis revealed that the dominant themes revolved around gamification, student engagement, engineering education, and game-based learning, while instructional design and the role of lecturers were in a less central position in the main discourse. The thematic synthesis identifies four main dimensions, namely the digital competence of lecturers, the cognitive load in gamification design, the alignment of lecturer and student motivation, and the need for a systematic pedagogical design framework. These findings show a significant gap in the model that systematically guides lecturers in designing pedagogically aligned gamification in the STEM context. In response, this study proposes a conceptual framework of Lecturer-Centered Gamification (LCG) structured in pre-game, in-game, and post-game phases, emphasizing pedagogical intentionality, interaction design, and systematic evaluation. This study makes a theoretical contribution by repositioning the role of lecturers as the core of gamification architecture, as well as practical contributions as the foundation for the development of sustainable and scalable gamified learning designs in higher education.
References
[1] M. Ortiz, K. Chiluiza, and M. Valcke, “GAMIFICATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION AND STEM: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF LITERATURE,” EDULEARN16 Proceedings, vol. 1, pp. 6548–6558, Jul. 2016, doi: 10.21125/edulearn.2016.0422.
[2] C. Mahendra, R. E. Prabowo, D. K. Paath, W. N. Mili, D. Bergitta, and D. Annawati, “Gamifikasi dalam Pendidikan STEM: Transformasi Pembelajaran dan Pemberdayaan Siswa menuju Industri 5.0,” Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 92–100, Nov. 2023, Accessed: Feb. 20, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/inovasi-pendidikan-fisika/article/view/57450
[3] I. L. Khalid, M. N. S. Abdullah, and H. Mohd Fadzil, “A Systematic Review: Digital Learning in STEM Education,” Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 98–115, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.37934/araset.51.1.98115.
[4] L. Rahmawati and D. Juandi, “PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DENGAN PENDEKATAN STEM: SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW,” Teorema: Teori dan Riset Matematika, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 149–160, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.25157/teorema.v7i1.6914.
[5] C. Johnson and M. Roopaei, “Strategic Gamification for STEM: Transforming Projects into Interactive Learning Quests,” 2025 15th IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference, ISEC 2025, 2025, doi: 10.1109/ISEC64801.2025.11147352.
[6] Z. Wang, J. Harun, and Y. Yuan, “ENHANCING READING INSTRUCTION THROUGH GAMIFICATION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THEORETICAL MODELS, IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES, AND MEASURABLE OUTCOMES (2020–2024),” Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, vol. 23, pp. 1–27, 2024, doi: 10.28945/5394.
[7] Ó. J. G. Alcántara, I. F. González, and M. Á. C. López, “Kahoot!: Effective, simple and easy gamification in Higher Education. Practical application in an Engineering Degree[KAHOOT!: GAMIFICACIÓN EFICAZ, SENCILLA Y FÁCIL EN LA EDUCACIÓN SUPERIOR: Aplicación práctica en un Grado de Ingeniería],” Human Review. International Humanities Review / Revista Internacional de Humanidades, vol. 11, no. Monografico, 2022, doi: 10.37467/revhuman.v11.3949.
[8] J. C. Arias and F. E. Mon, “Gamified flipped classroom as a pedagogical strategy in higher education: A systematic review[Aula invertida gamificada como estrategia pedagógica en la educación superior: Una revisión sistemática],” Edutec, no. 80, pp. 84–98, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.21556/edutec.2022.80.2435.
[9] L. D. Thi, “Game-Based Learning in Improving Student Engagement,” International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, vol. IX, no. V, pp. 5116–5123, 2025, doi: 10.47772/IJRISS.2025.905000397.
[10] S. Roseily, K. Agustini, and N. N. Parwati, “ARCS Model-Based Educational Game for Athletics in Physical Education,” vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 648–656, 2025.
[11] H. Haruna et al., “Improving instruction and sexual health literacy with serious games and gamification interventions: an outlook to students’ learning outcomes and gender differences,” Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 2392–2410, 2023, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2021.1888754.
[12] O. Y. Yuliana and Y. Palumian, “Gamification of Learning Management System Improves Students’ Engagement, Active Learning and Performance,” 2023 14th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology and System, ICTS 2023, pp. 62–66, 2023, doi: 10.1109/ICTS58770.2023.10330870.
[13] P. Strousopoulos, C. Troussas, A. Krouska, and C. Sgouropoulou, “The Gamification Advantage: Innovating Education through Engagement,” Proceedings - 2024 9th South-East Europe Design Automation, Computer Engineering, Computer Networks and Social Media Conference, SEEDA-CECNSM 2024, pp. 204–208, 2024, doi: 10.1109/SEEDA-CECNSM63478.2024.00045.
[14] “Gamified scaffolding in formal education: A scoping review,” 2024, Accessed: Apr. 15, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85199797900?origin=scopusAI
[15] A. S. Mandala, I. R. Hidayah, D. Hamidah, Y. I. P. Pranyata, and Fauziah, “The impact of gamification approach on students’ mathematical critical thinking: A meta-analysis,” AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 3316, no. 1, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.1063/5.0290421.
[16] P. N. Rito, “The Role of Video Game Narratives in Educational Engagement: Insights and Perspectives,” in Challenges of Educational Innovation in Contemporary Society, IGI Global, 2025, pp. 267–298. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3373-0705-3.ch013.
[17] B. Budiyono, W. Wiryanto, S. Suprayitno, and M. G. Primaniarta, “Persepsi Mahasiswa Pendidikan Dasar terhadap Gamifikasi dalam Pendidikan STEAM,” Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 3591–3603, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.31004/obsesi.v7i3.4909.
[18] C. Mahendra, R. E. Prabowo, D. K. Paath, W. N. Mili, D. Bergitta, and D. Annawati, “Gamifikasi dalam Pendidikan STEM: Transformasi Pembelajaran dan Pemberdayaan Siswa menuju Industri 5.0,” Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 92–100, Nov. 2023, Accessed: Feb. 20, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/inovasi-pendidikan-fisika/article/view/57450
[19] J. Arlinwibowo, N. Ishartono, Y. Linguistika, D. Purwoko, and Suprapto, “Gamification in the STEM Domain Subject: The Prospective Method to Strengthen Teaching and Learning,” Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 564–574, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.15294/jpii.v12i4.48388.
[20] U. Sultan Zainal Abidin, M. Omar, D. Farzeeha Ali, and F. Mohd Kamaruzaman, “Challenges and gender differences in implementing gamification approach among vocational college lecturers in Malaysia,” Journal of Nusantara Studies (JONUS), vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 123–140, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.24200/jonus.vol8iss2pp123-140.
[21] A. T. Febriansah, A. Syaifuddin, Y. Soepriyanto, T. Pendidikan, and U. N. Malang, “Gamification Developments in Education: PERKEMBANGAN GAMIFIKASI DI BIDANG PENDIDIKAN,” Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 177–186, May 2024, doi: 10.24246/j.js.2024.v14.i2.p177-186.
[22] Z. Zulirfan, Y. Yennita, M. Rahmad, and A. Purnama, “Desain dan Konstruksi Prototype KIT Proyek STEM Sebagai Media Pembelajaran IPA SMP Secara Daring pada Topik Aplikasi Listrik Dinamis,” Journal of Natural Science and Integration, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 40–49, May 2021, doi: 10.24014/jnsi.v4i1.11446.
[23] E. Lutfina, R. O. C. Setiawan, A. Nugroho, and M. Z. Abdillah, “PERANCANGAN APLIKASI PEMBELAJARAN DENGAN KONSEP GAMIFIKASI,” METHOMIKA: Jurnal Manajemen Informatika & Komputerisasi Akuntansi, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 78–87, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.46880/jmika.vol7no1.pp78-87.
[24] A. Shafira Dina and U. Negeri Jakarta, “SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW: STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN TERINTEGRASI DENGAN STEAM (SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, ART, MATHEMATICS) DAN TANTANGANNYA,” SCIENCE : Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 658–671, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.51878/science.v5i2.5162.
[25] J. Rokhmat, G. Gunawan, A. A. Sukarso, R. Rahmatiah, H. Mahmudah, and P. D. Amanah, “Revealing the Weaknesses of Applying Gamification in Science Learning and Overcoming It: A Systematic Review,” TEM Journal, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 2462–2471, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.18421/TEM143-50.
[26] I. Kamaruddin et al., “Implementasi Metode Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek dalam Pendidikan Tinggi untuk Memfasilitasi Pemecahan Masalah Multidisiplin,” Journal on Education, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 19620–19630, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.31004/joe.v6i4.5990.
[27] A. Shafira Dina and U. Negeri Jakarta, “SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW: STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN TERINTEGRASI DENGAN STEAM (SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, ART, MATHEMATICS) DAN TANTANGANNYA,” SCIENCE : Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 658–671, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.51878/science.v5i2.5162.
[28] S. Deterding, D. Dixon, R. Khaled, and L. Nacke, “From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining ‘gamification,’” Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments, MindTrek 2011, pp. 9–15, 2011, doi: 10.1145/2181037.2181040.
[29] J. Hamari, J. Koivisto, and H. Sarsa, “Does gamification work? - A literature review of empirical studies on gamification,” Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 3025–3034, 2014, doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2014.377.
[30] M. Sailer and L. Homner, “The Gamification of Learning: a Meta-analysis,” Educ. Psychol. Rev., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 77–112, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10648-019-09498-w.
[31] “Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. What the Student Does (4th ed.). Berkshire Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press. New York Open University Press. - References - Scientific Research P….” Accessed: Feb. 20, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2544735
[32] C. M. Reigeluth, “Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory,” Instructional-Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory, vol. 2, pp. 1–715, Jan. 2013, doi: 10.4324/9781410603784.
[33] C. Malamed, “Book Review: ‘The Gamification of Learning and Instruction: Game-Based Methods and Strategies For Training And Education’ by Karl Kapp,” eLearn, vol. 2012, no. 5, May 2012, doi: 10.1145/2207270.2211316.
[34] D. Persico, M. Passarelli, F. Dagnino, F. Manganello, J. Earp, and F. Pozzi, “Games and Learning: Potential and Limitations from the Players’ Point of View,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 11385 LNCS, pp. 134–145, 2019, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-11548-7_13.
[35] “Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What Is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9, 60-70. - References - Scientific Research Publishing.” Accessed: Feb. 20, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1565932
[36] J. Sweller, “Cognitive Load Theory,” Psychology of Learning and Motivation - Advances in Research and Theory, vol. 55, pp. 37–76, Jan. 2011, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8.
[37] E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan, “The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior,” Psychol. Inq., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 227–268, 2000, doi: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.
[38] M. Sailer and L. Homner, “The Gamification of Learning: a Meta-analysis,” Educ. Psychol. Rev., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 77–112, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10648-019-09498-w.
[39] D. Persico, M. Passarelli, F. Dagnino, F. Manganello, J. Earp, and F. Pozzi, “Games and Learning: Potential and Limitations from the Players’ Point of View,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 11385 LNCS, pp. 134–145, 2019, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-11548-7_13.
[40] N. R. Haddaway, M. J. Page, C. C. Pritchard, and L. A. McGuinness, “PRISMA2020 : An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis,” Campbell Systematic Reviews, vol. 18, no. 2, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1002/cl2.1230.
